Results for ""
Evolutionary developments and the Problem statement
If we look at the past three Industrial revolutions of 18th, 19th and 20th centuries, from Steam to Electricity to Computing, these all were directed towards improving efficiency and speed of the processes in which humans were involved. And the fourth Industrial revolution of 21st century, denoted as I 4.0, is no different except that it deals with multidisciplinary technologies and the context of high aspirations of the society, rendering the realization to be much more complex and challenging.
Factors that have contributed to evolution of I 4.0 can be summarized as below:
The Project I 4.0 that was conceptualized a decade ago with a high tech strategy of German Government to promote computerization in manufacturing, is seen expanding its scope to a much bigger dimension necessitated by factors such as;
Consequently, the concept is taking form of a much larger and an integrated system described as :
‘Information Intensive transformation of manufacturing, and other industries, in a connected environment of data, people, processes, services, systems and IoT enabled industry assets, with generation, leverage and utilization of actionable information as a means to realize smart industry and eco system of industrial innovation and collaboration.” (Wikipedia)’
The four pillars of this transformation are :
Solutions/Technology implementations
So, what are the drivers for this transformation to take place ?
It is indeed the technologies, the associated environments and the organizational regulations that are driving this transformation, conceptualized a decade ago, to serve the society.
The constituent technologies of I 4.0, as the enabling drivers, that are primarily responsible for building solutions are :
Challenges
Coupled with the promise that 1 4.0 offers, there are challenges as have been seen and reported in various contexts. These can be divided in following four categories;
Economic
High economic cost of implementation
Adoption of new business model
Integration of pre-existing systems (CAD,CAM, CAE,ERP,MES,PLM)
Ambiguous economic benefits
Social
Privacy concerns
Surveillance and distrust
General reluctance to change
Threat of redundancy of Corp IT projects
Loss of (low end) jobs
Lack of required skills
Political
Lack of Regulations
Unclear Legal issues
Lack of appetite to change
Organizational
Security of data
Reliability & scalability
Low management support
Insufficient experience
Integrity of Processes
Risk of investment paying back
As a result, the risks perceived in the I 4.0 implementation are that the investments are needed ahead of well documented results in different types of industry project implementations, Skills are still far and few as there is a reported woeful shortage of experienced manpower, and jobs have to transform to next level of technological and managerial disciplines.
Cost – Benefits
While the debate continues and new business models get evolved out of the I 4.0 implementations, the predicted benefits ( as visualized) outweigh the costs. Below are some pointers in that direction.
Outlook - where do we go from here !
Industry 4.0 is a much talked about discipline. It has been fueled by the increasing automation in manufacturing, use of smart sensors and IoT devices to capture real time data from the field, larger play of technology of Artificial Intelligence and Machine learning for predictive analytics and decision support, enormity of data that is available to monetize using new emerging business models, availability of very high performance computing powers for meeting the processing speeds and complexity of the emerging data from an industrial operation. The implementation opportunities offered cover full cycle of industrial manufacturing, supply chain, services and organizational new business models that are directly relevant to the needs of the Society today.
As per the reports, currently only 30 % of manufacturing is expected to adopt I 4.0 and maximize benefits. The potential is huge, and is dictated by the extent and speed of adoption of the constituent technologies of I 4.0 mentioned in this Paper, and acceptance of the society of the principles on which 1 4.0 is based.
The terms Cyber Physical Systems, Smart Manufacturing, Factory of the Future, Industrial Internet etc have evolved as synonyms to I 4.0.
At the same time efforts, setting aside the often controversial argument of, if technology will make machine to replace Man or augment the Man, efforts need to focus on man and machine to reconcile and find ways and means to work together to realize the ultimate benefits of improved efficiency in operation, and demystify 1 4.0. This will lead to an increased interaction of human intelligence and cognitive computing. Eventually meet with the objective of serving humanity with improved efficiencies, better utilization of resources, cost savings, and clean environments.
Countries, notably USA, UK, Germany, France, Japan, China have programs that are implementing I 4.0 in Automobile manufacturing, Process industry, Supply –Chain. In India discrete I 4.0 implementations have been carried out in the Industry. Government is seized with the potential I 4.0 offers and is promoting policies and schemes to attract greater investments.
References : • The Factory of the Future (www.ibm.com/industrial/manufacturing) • Industry 4.0-Wikipedia(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_4.0 ) • Industry 4.0-Deloitte (www.deloitte.com/us/en/Insights/focus/Industry-4.0) • What is Industry 4.0 /The Industrial Internet of Things (www.Epicor.com/en-us/resource-centre) • Quick Guide to Industry 4.0 and 5.0 (www.I-scoop.en/Industry-4.o) • Architecture of Industry 4.0 based Manufacturing SystemsThesisCMU-RI-TR-16-43, July 2016 - Achal Arvind