Results for ""
Kannan Ramamoorthy co-founded TechConative, which provides product engineering solutions to developing enterprises.
He has worked on various engineering and machine learning projects, guiding them to success.
INDIAai interviewed Kannan to get his perspective on AI.
TechConative is primarily a Product Engineering and R&D company. We solve business problems in the real world that our clients have. And we also help our customers to research some of the technical problems to articulate and formulate the path forward.
On the way, we create artefacts (open-source projects and writings of our experiments) out of valuable things that we figure out.
We're setting our foot in AI. We primarily focus on Natural Language Processing (NLP) & Generative-AI (GAI) to solve some of our client's problems.
We're dealing with clients in a profitable business with some substantial pain points that demand AI. The problems are along the varying degree of complexity, starting from basic Semantic search, Content suggestions to advanced levels such as helping QA(Quality Assurance) with AI and Code generation.
The challenges that we face are multi-dimensional. Given that the question is coming from GoI magazine let me just put out a few problems which could be informative for the Government on helping startups.
When we started, as we were focussing primarily on business, we needed to be made aware of things like Startup tax holidays and other benefits.
A formal counselling board integrated as part of the registration process would be helpful in such aspects.
Below are some of the ongoing challenges:
Python and Notebooks are de-facto when it comes to AI/ML.
Additionally, we're also using/experimenting with the below tools,
Akin to the saying, "What we consume is what we are", "AI models are the data that is fed into it "(without undermining the inherent capability in the "self" and the "model").
Hence the solution lies more with the data than with the algorithm.
A simple start is to become aware of the biases and to try to minimize them consciously. For example, let's say we're dealing with an ML problem about credit risk analysis, and your solution may have bias not because you want it to be biased but because you're not aware or have taken steps for it not to be biased. Though it's possible to argue that this is a societal problem, such solutions are god-like. If you're conscious of the consequences, you can minimize the perpetuation of the bias.
We can minimize bias by diversifying our training data, using a fair base model, and conducting regular bias audits. While it's true that this bias is a societal problem, we believe in responsibly leveraging AI's power to reduce the perpetuation of biases rather than amplifying them.
Given where it comes from, I assume the question is specific to AI.
In response, get-it-done is one of the attributes infused by hands-on leadership in all engineers. Some industry leaders act as our advisors, such as Sudalai Rajkumar(best known as SRK in the ML community).
With this, we're in a unique position where we can solve our customers' problems cost-effectively.
The foot we have set in AI will complement the engineering excellence we have inherited and built.
My advice will be primarily for ML engineers, as that's where most of my interactions have been.
In a fast-changing profession, it's essential to keep up with the best solutions in your interests, which most engineers do, especially in ML.
On the other hand, it's also essential to become an end-to-end engineer in the area you have chosen with an end-to-end idea. Sometimes, you might not be able to make the choices, but it's good to know the answers to the questions.
For example, being an ML engineer, when working on a specific problem, it's essential to know,
Though being end-to-end would be more than just grasping the above questions, these questions are an excellent place to start.
While answering these questions, knowing you are rational and not rational is essential. It means that you collect the data and arrive at an answer to the query rather than have a decision and arrive at the reasoning supporting it.
A lot can be mentioned here. But let me keep it short with three mentions.
In addition to books, I draw a lot from people. Richard Feynman, Paul Graham and Srikumar Subramanian(My mentor) are a few.